Jump to content

Jeroen Zuiderwijk

Members
  • Content Count

    1,674
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    17

Jeroen Zuiderwijk last won the day on March 3

Jeroen Zuiderwijk had the most liked content!

Community Reputation

204 Excellent

Contact Methods

  • Website URL
    https://www.facebook.com/barbarianmetalworking
  • ICQ
    0

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Interests
    Bronze age, iron age, early medieval.

Recent Profile Visitors

2,574 profile views
  1. I'm guessing the owner must have lost more then just his knife.
  2. Not that I know of. The blades are pretty corroded, and I see no sign of patternwelding.
  3. Exactly, and a bit oval in top view.
  4. And just for fun, here's one of the most extreme original examples. Max blade width 87mm! Blade length 415mm.
  5. Just for completeness sake, here's a picture of what it's like finished. I've finished it many years ago but never uploaded photos to this thread. Just to be clear, while the blade is based on an original, the handle isn't and most likely was just a straight, longer hilt much like on other seaxes. However, more complete examples need to be found to be certain about that.
  6. And there's also one with horn hilt plates remaining, but the pommel not preserved. I've reproduced that hilt on one of my Ewart Park swords (blade cast by Neil Burridge).
  7. I only just see this thread now. You're not far of, but some differences in shape were used with regards to the pommel shape and the hilt ending. Of the Ewart Park style sword, several examples have been found where the hilt was made either partially or entirely of (hollow) bronze, which show what the hilt shapes would have been.
  8. It's a pretty common practice among antiques dealers to put fake hilts on authentic pieces. A complete looking piece sells better then an incomplete one. There's even a seax in the National museum here that has various bits of belt plates etc. glued together to form a hilt. The one with the bronze hilt I am pretty certain that it's a fake, inspired by the wooden hilted one. The blade is probably real, but the hilt certainly isn't. It's a broad seax with an iron bolster. Iron bolsters on broad seaxes are fairly rare, except on Langobardic ones, where nearly all of them have an iron bolster. So there's a good chance that the blade is Langobardic. The one with the "wooden" hilt may be the real thing. But I strongly suspect that the hilt isn't wood. It looks more like bone or horn to me. But anything that doesn't come through official archaeological circles I automatically assume to be a fake or messed with, unless there is very strong evidence to prove otherwise. And anything that does come through archaeological circles that looks off, I still don't trust. Much of the collections of museums also comes through antiques dealers or from private owners, and a lot has been messed around. Provenances are falsified, bits are "restored" or faked and sometimes the entire artifacts are highly questionable, even in official museum collections. This is why artifacts are found by archaeologists and properly documented are so much more valuable.
  9. That's not the case. Copper alloys can take up hydrogen and oxygen. Hydrogen causes brittleness and oxygen causes porosity. So you need to ensure the metal is in a reducing environment (preferably have some charcoal floating in it if you use a gass forge), and don't overheat it. The hotter and longer the metal is heated, the more gasses it absorbs.
  10. Here's Jake Powning casting bronze with a more shallow crucible, probably such a ceramic one: I'd advice though to make tongs that enclose the crucible, rather then grab the edge, as it make it less likely that the crucible will break and fall.
  11. That won't work. Cast iron will melt along with the brass/bronze. Even regular steel won''t last well, as it dissolves into copper alloys well below the melting point of the steel. An alternative just getting a much larger crucible, and cutting it down. I know there are bowl shaped ceramic crucibles available, which are used f.e. for gold and silver casting. I don't know if they exist in the size you are looking for, such as: https://sunnymountain.net/products/alumina-ceramic-crucible-3-inch
  12. Interesting. Also that they are getting brass straight from ore. I don't know of any occurrences of copper and zinc ore that you can smelt directly into brass, but that's based European ores. Also interesting to see they use sandcasting, and a wooden stick as a core to make the socket. I'd like to try that someday early copper age shafthole axes. Also interesting to see some tools are exactly the same as I used in my prehistoric bronze casting, like the wooden tongs, while others are quite different.
  13. These are pretty. While the modern made exceptionally finely finished examples are beautiful, the more free hand formed and decorated old ones have their own charm. Plus I can do that easier then a perfect fit and finish
  14. Quite a few things. First thing that I've been wanting to do for quite some time is patternwelding on my own. I did a first attempt: My welds were succesful, but a flaw in the wrought made this blade a failure sadly. However, considering the circumstances where I made it, I was pretty pleased that it worked: It was during a Viking event. And I was limited to what I could bring on my bicycle, including clothing, sleeping gear, forge, bellows, charcoal etc. So with just a 2kg anvil, few bags of charcoal I did get quite far. Which makes me hopeful that I will manage when I'll try at home with fewer limitations. I'd really like to work more with wrought iron, shear steel to make a series of seaxes, patternwelded or otherwise. Once I finish the Nijmegen reproduction, I need to start a second one, to include everything I've learned about the original since I started my first reconstruction: I'd also like to have a go at non-ferrous wire inlay on seaxes. I was well on my way learning to make seaxes, but right when I got to a level I was happy with, I lost the opportunity (time mostly) to go further with it. There are also various swords still on my wish list. The early iron age sword of Oss for example: Reconstructions have been made before, but there is new information found, which has not yet been included. Further more, a Frankish patternwelded sword is also on my wish list, this particular one: I've known that sword from the other side of the glass for about 25 years now, and I will try to make it some day, even if it takes me another 25 years or more (which is not unlikely considering the length of some projects I've already started ) In bronze, I'd still like to make a bronze hilted central European style sword, and if possible from ore to sword, similar to these: I'm already part way there, I've smelted a sufficient amount of copper, and some of the tin I need. I still need to make more tin, and I have the metals. I do have enough tin ore, but it's of such a difficult to process quality that it will take me a few hundred hours of pounding it to dust and panning to separate the ore from the matrix. So I'm looking for a higher grade ore. Ideally I'd cast it in bronze age moulds, but if it must happen in a modern mould, I'd still be quite pleased. But first challenge is to go and forge again in the near future. First plan is to just make a small knife. Once available forging time increases again, which may take some years, I will pick up more challenging projects. At least my hands are itching to start playing with fire and hot metal, and I've been working my way up to the point of being able to spare a few hours here and there again!
×
×
  • Create New...