Bill Schmalhofer 82 Posted January 10 Share Posted January 10 (edited) I have been wanting to try a hearth furnace for several months now, but a leak in the master bathroom and the resulting repair work has had me occupied for a long time. Today I finally said I need eda mental health day and to do something fun. So hearth furnace run one. Did the (what seems to be becoming the ) standard 7 brick furnace with the blower from my first coal forge. Charged it with 5 - 200 gram charges of A36 that I had sitting around. Time between charges was about 5-6 minutes. Total recovery was about 800 grams. Furnace before first charge. Had two pieces come out. Here's the main one. Is about 770 grams. Spark test of beginning material. Spark test of furnace material. Same belt, same grinder speed, same pressure as the starting material picture. Any thoughts on carbon content? Also, as I was consolidating it after pulling out of the furnace, it seemed super solid. I was not able to move it much with a 4 pound hammer. Edited January 10 by Bill Schmalhofer captions on pictures 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Alan Longmire 2,639 Posted January 11 Share Posted January 11 Looks like you have made some ultra-high-carbon steel or white cast iron, one or the other. You're on the right trail, but you may want to level out the tuyere a bit more to lower the end carbon content, if that puck has too much carbon to forge. Cool stuff! Link to post Share on other sites
Bill Schmalhofer 82 Posted January 11 Author Share Posted January 11 (edited) Thanks for the reply Alan. I had a feeling I was a bit high in carbon. The tuyere was almost flat in when I was running. I dropped it by a brick height from where it was in the first picture after I got the fire going. I was thinking I may have to point it down a bit more to add some oxygen to lower the carbon. I also have a question for those that run hearth furnaces. Do you slag any of your fire bricks? This is what is left of the brick that the tuyere was stuck through. I don't remember seeing anyone else on the forum have this issue. The two bricks next to this one also had some damage but nothing like this. Lastly, my plan had been to heat the puck up to welding temperature in my forge and try to consolidate it and forge it flat. I'm assuming if the carbon is too high, if I go this route, it will just crumble when I pound on it? Edited January 11 by Bill Schmalhofer Additional comment 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Bill Schmalhofer 82 Posted Monday at 08:15 PM Author Share Posted Monday at 08:15 PM (edited) Round two of the hearth furnace and I decided to put Alan's frequent comment (you can use bottle caps, cans, lids, etc) to the test. Started with 1200 grams of material and final puck was 860 grams. The first run went very slowly for some reason. Had a total of 6 charges at 200 grams a charge and was averaging about 6-7 minutes between charges. At the end of the run, pulled a puck out of the furnace that was almost dead even with the tuyere. Was able to distinctly make out a few screws and a nail sticking out of it. Went to consolidated it and it crumbled into 5 chunks. The furnace was still glowing so I just fired it back up and ran the chunks through (nothing to loose right?). This time the charges went much faster. Was getting three minutes between charges this time. Pulled a single puck out that was well below the tuyere. Several small pieces broke off during consolidation, but I ended up with the 860 gram puck. This time it turned out to be bi-polar. Decent carbon on the top and what looks like wrought iron on the bottom. Between the two runs I have about 1600 grams of material. First nice day that I can get my forge out, I'm going to process them and see if I can combine the two. And I slagged another fire brick that had the tuyere going through it. 1200 grams of starting material. Material after first run through the furnace. couple of screws and a nail clearly visible. Spark test of the top of the final puck. Spark test of the bottom. O1 as a comparison. Edited Monday at 08:23 PM by Bill Schmalhofer captions on pictures Link to post Share on other sites
Alan Longmire 2,639 Posted yesterday at 05:39 PM Share Posted yesterday at 05:39 PM Toldja it would work. On any melt or bloomery smelt you're not going to have a homogenous carbon distribution. That's why we hear so much about how many times the steel for katanas was "folded." That's what you have to do to even out the carbon, assuming you want to even it out. The other thing you can do is separate out the high-C stuff from the low, and use the high-C as blade material and the low C as wrought iron. 1 Link to post Share on other sites
Bill Schmalhofer 82 Posted yesterday at 08:34 PM Author Share Posted yesterday at 08:34 PM 2 hours ago, Alan Longmire said: Toldja it would work. Trust but verify.... Don't think there is enough to be able to separate the two sides out. Going to try to fold and even it out and then combine with my first puck (if possible). It's interesting to note that when I did my first run, I was using fairly large solid pieces of starting material and the entire puck seems to be that super high carbon material. The second run was tiny pieces of bit and bobs and I got the very heterogeneous mixed puck. Have to keep track of this observation... Also, the first puck is a solid chunk. The second one looks like a sponge on the edges - like something was being aerated through it as in sat in the charcoal. Any thoughts on this? Thanks again for all your help. Link to post Share on other sites
Alan Longmire 2,639 Posted 23 hours ago Share Posted 23 hours ago I've gotten the foamy outside when I use little bits as well. I suspect we should turn the air down a notch when doing small stuff, but what fun is that? Link to post Share on other sites
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now