Nijmegen narrow seax

[Alan Longmire]

And his first name's not Tod, either! . Nicknames and so on.  But he's a great guy. Hardest working guy I've ever met. 

[Stuart Samuel]

6 hours ago, Alan Longmire said:

For some reason I am reminded of one of my favorite photos:

 

 

Owen Bush's house, spring 2011, I don't remember who took the picture.  Maybe Grace Horne?  Left to right: Peter Johnsson, Tod of Tod Cutler (his last name is not cutler, btw), I don't remember who's holding the camera, maybe Eli Sideris? Jeff Pringle, Petr Florianek, Jeroen Zuiderwijk, Josh Burrell, and me.  Hard to believe that was 12 years ago... 

That was a really excellent, if slightly blurry, weekend, thanks for the reminder Alan!

 

(It was bizarre ending up at a week long course with Eli, in 2017 (tool making, with Seth Gould). Hadn't seen any of those folks since)

[Jeroen Zuiderwijk]

17 hours ago, Alan Longmire said:

For some reason I am reminded of one of my favorite photos:

 

 

Owen Bush's house, spring 2011, I don't remember who took the picture.  Maybe Grace Horne?  Left to right: Peter Johnsson, Tod of Tod Cutler (his last name is not cutler, btw), I don't remember who's holding the camera, maybe Eli Sideris? Jeff Pringle, Petr Florianek, Jeroen Zuiderwijk, Josh Burrell, and me.  Hard to believe that was 12 years ago... 

One of my favorite photos and moments too. It was great to be among such talented and inspiring people, particularly for an amateur like me   I hope there will be more times like that!

[Josh Burrell]

Such a great picture, I had to sign back in! 

Jeroen posted it to facebook. 

it was a great weekend. cant believe it was that long ago. I suspect its James Wood behind the camera,  Alan

[Alan Longmire]

Probably so, Josh, thanks!  And good to see you're still up and about!  

 

Sorry for utterly hijacking your thread, Jeroen...

[Jeroen Zuiderwijk]

On 6/3/2023 at 2:28 PM, Alan Longmire said:

Probably so, Josh, thanks!  And good to see you're still up and about!  

 

Sorry for utterly hijacking your thread, Jeroen...

For great memories like that you are welcome too. It is related though, since I did the seax lecture then, and I believe I brought this seax with me in unfinished state. So it's still on topic

[Jeroen Zuiderwijk]

Yesterday I started on stitching the sheath. I'm using a zigzag stitch, which was also used on the Groningen sheath(s). I yet have to figure out how to do this correctly. At least the way I'm doing it is certainly not the way to go. I punched the holes on the front side only, and started stitching the thread at about 45 degrees, and then back through the same hole at 45 degrees to the other side. At least that's the intention. 

 

But getting the needle to exit exactly where I want is a real challenge. On the back side, it's a total mess, certainly the first 10 stitches, which are between 2cm and 2mm apart. But like everything I make, I consider this a practice piece to learn from. Mistakes are part of the process. On the front side, I just keep poking the needle until it exits the pre-punched holes (or right next to it). There has to be an easier way to do this. Next time I will punch the holes on both flaps at 45 degrees and stitch before gluing the flaps. At least then any mismatch will be hidden on the inside. 

 

Anyway, it's an interesting stitching pattern, that I haven't seen anyone else doing. Does anyone else have experience with it?

[Jeroen Zuiderwijk]

This is the type of stitch:

 

[Joshua States]

I have stitched leather a variety of ways, but that isn't one of them. 

If I understand the stitch pattern correctly. there should be a series of double holes on each side of the seam, and these hole locations are offset from one another side to side..  So, for example, if on side A you have a series of hole locations , each location has two holes spaced 3 mm apart, (center to center), and the next set of holes is centered 1 cm away from the last set of holes, the holes on side B would be spaced the same, but side B locations are in the middle of the Side A locations. At least that's what I see looking at the first panel in your diagrams.

 

Side A Holes x      x  x       x  x       x  x

Side B holes  x  x        x  x       x  x

 

The last panel on your diagram doesn't look like that though. That panel looks more like the last hole in the pair on one side lines up with the first hole in a pair on the other side. So there would be one stitch straight across and the next one at a sharp angle.

 

Side A holes     x      x  x      x  x      x  x

Side B holes     x  x      x  x      x  x      x  x

 

In both hole patterns, the stitch process is this:

The first two holes line up across the seam. The thread enters on side A at the first hole and goes straight across through the first hole in side B.

Back through the second hole in side B on a 45* angle through the second hole in side A.

Over the top through the third hole in side A. Straight across through the third hole in Side B.

Repeat process

Edited August 3 by Joshua States

[Jeroen Zuiderwijk]

9 hours ago, Joshua States said:

In both hole patterns, the stitch process is this:

The first two holes line up across the seam. The thread enters on side A at the first hole and goes straight across through the first hole in side B.

Back through the second hole in side B on a 45* angle through the second hole in side A.

Over the top through the third hole in side A. Straight across through the third hole in Side B.

Repeat process

On the original sheath(s) it's just one hole or slit on the surface, rather then two. And the row on the other side is staggered with regards to the first side. You don't need the second holes if you do 45 degree angles, you can use the same hole to go back. I did end up using two holes occasionally, but that's simply because the needle exited next to the pre punched slits. 

[Joshua States]

I'm not understanding that at all. If you go back through the same hole you just came through, doesn't the stich fail?

Maybe I'm misunderstanding, but it would make sense to me that going back through the same hole, regardless of the angle made, the stitch cannot stay on the side you just came out of.

[Aiden CC]

I'm a bit confused as well. I've been trying to make sense of how this sheath is stitched to try and replicate it, but haven't quite gotten there. When you used a single hole, how do you keep the thread loop from pulling through? Does each "slit" branch into two "tunnels" in the leather?

[Doug Lester]

I'm glad that I'm not the only one who is totally lost.

 

Doug

[Alan Longmire]

2 hours ago, Aiden CC said:

Does each "slit" branch into two "tunnels" in the leather?

 

Yep, that's what's happening.  The needle comes through at a 45 degree angle. Then it goes back in at the opposite 45 degree angle, leaving what looks like a dot of thread on that surface.

 

I've never done it, though.  I'd think you'd need a glovers' needle or similar triangular awl-pointed needle to do it.

[Joshua States]

9 hours ago, Alan Longmire said:

I've never done it, though.  I'd think you'd need a glovers' needle or similar triangular awl-pointed needle to do it.

Those I have! And you can too....

Straight Leather Needles for Leather Working (3riversarchery.com)

or buy aenough to last a lifetime

Size 0, C.S Osborne 3 Cornered Point Glover Needle, #T-518-0 (weaverleathersupply.com)

 

[Jeroen Zuiderwijk]

I used a flat tipped needle. I simply converted a normal one, by annealing it and hammering the tip flat. Next time I will harden it again though, as I had to keep straightening it out

[Jeroen Zuiderwijk]

I've applied the decoration based on one of the Groningen sheath finds (Usquert). Quality is a bit meh due to f.e. the waviness of the lines. Next time lines first, then stitching holes, stitch and then glue the flaps together. I also had to do a bit of guess work on the snake patterns. And since had a longer panel left near the tip, I had to be a bit creative with how to fill it in. It's alright as a practice piece I guess. And since I rarely actually get around to make sheaths or scabbards as this is generally the plan, but never done, I'm happy I got this far. Now I need to seal it. I'm questioning whether to use grease or wax. Wax would be better, keeping the leather more stiff. But I did a practice piece, and it got so dark that it hid the patters almost entirely. Of course I can fill the patterns in like the The St Cuthbert Gospel, but hmm... And I need to apply rivets and suspension. And for that I need to make rivets, and for that I need to make rivet heading tools. 

[Dick Sexstone]

I like the pattern work you did....it would be a shame to make them difficult to see......

[Pieter-Paul Derks]

Now that turned out great, it really looks like a museum piece.

I had always believed that seax sheaths covered most of the handle, but I might be wrong on that for this type of knife.

[Joshua States]

On 8/14/2023 at 1:07 AM, Pieter-Paul Derks said:

I had always believed that seax sheaths covered most of the handle,

I have wondered about that myself. I always thought that would make it difficult to draw the knife in a hurry when needed.

A little more handle showing out of the sheath makes it easier.

Then there are those that have a ring or a lanyard hole in the pommel. That makes it easier to draw quickly if the handle is deeply covered.

[Jeroen Zuiderwijk]

On 8/14/2023 at 10:07 AM, Pieter-Paul Derks said:

Now that turned out great, it really looks like a museum piece.

I had always believed that seax sheaths covered most of the handle, but I might be wrong on that for this type of knife.

That's the case for later broken back style seaxes. Earlier ones usually had only part of the hilt covered.